tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31846591.post8416448626446241793..comments2024-03-18T05:14:37.850-04:00Comments on The Sentimental Heretic רגשיות עם רגישות: Goldman-SucksShlomo Leib Aronovitzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10407211641091145197noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31846591.post-87653932164972826872015-08-10T17:00:51.327-04:002015-08-10T17:00:51.327-04:00its a given the best info...
nazlin
ankitha
priya ...its a given the best info...<br /><a href="http://www.nazlinservice.com/" rel="nofollow">nazlin</a><br /><a href="http://www.ankithaservices.com/" rel="nofollow">ankitha</a><br /><a href="http://www.priyavipservice.com/" rel="nofollow">priya services</a><br />rainawebdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07617270214180018603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31846591.post-88142240446017984402015-08-10T17:00:50.729-04:002015-08-10T17:00:50.729-04:00its a given the best info...
nazlin
ankitha
priya ...its a given the best info...<br /><a href="http://www.nazlinservice.com/" rel="nofollow">nazlin</a><br /><a href="http://www.ankithaservices.com/" rel="nofollow">ankitha</a><br /><a href="http://www.priyavipservice.com/" rel="nofollow">priya services</a><br />rainawebdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07617270214180018603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31846591.post-30241495514649778552007-02-18T18:28:00.000-05:002007-02-18T18:28:00.000-05:00Paid...not payed...DUHPaid...not payed...DUHShlomo Leib Aronovitzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10407211641091145197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31846591.post-50421092477532242232007-02-18T18:26:00.000-05:002007-02-18T18:26:00.000-05:00re: I am always amazed at how anti-capitalists, su...re: I am always amazed at how anti-capitalists, such as yourself, can be so willfully ingnorant. <BR/><BR/>Ignorant of what? It seems that you are making apologies for something after the fact, that before and during the fact, you either had no knowledge of nor cared to know. Who is the ignorant one? <BR/><BR/>re: Why should Goldman Sachs remain in the city, paying high NYC taxes?<BR/><BR/>They knew NYC had high taxes when they built there. They had a choice from the beginning to remain or move each and every year they have been in business. Goldman Sachs has also never lost money and continues to control and menipulate markets to their advantage, even going so far as to have their previous CEO installed in a key government position in the Bush administration. Stop treating Goldman-Sachs like they are some poor victim. Trust me, it is they who are victimizers. <BR/><BR/>re: They not only have every right to leave the city for another state that offers lower taxes<BR/><BR/>Which state would that be? New Jersey? Nebraska? Arkansas? New Mexico? How about Puerto Rico? And you don't think they, like WalMart, aren't going to milk the tax-break schemes like they have in NYC, no matter where they end up? C'mon. Successful companies should NOT EVER be asking the government for help, especially when the taxpayers have to make up the difference in lost revenue. They will never leave NYC, because it is the international hub of trading. Besides, what would be so bad if they left? Really. How many people live in NYC compared to how many work for Goldman-Sachs? I doubt NYC would notice them missing. Their idle threat to leave NYC was bullshit, and it was a ploy to garner some public support. <BR/><BR/>Every business in NYC has the choice to leave and they don't for a very good reason. If they cannot survive, then maybe they should find something else to do. Once we let one company get away with tax breaks they don't require, then every other firm will follow suit. Soon, none of the huge money makers will pay taxes at all. <BR/><BR/>re: they are obligated to their shareholders to reduce cost as much as possible. <BR/><BR/>This is the stupidest shit I've ever heard. Goldman-Sachs isn't lowering it's operating costs. It's passing its rising operating costs onto the taxpayers. Costs have not gone down, only the amount they will pay as a result of their political extortion. Do you really believe that a wildly successful corporation like Goldman-Sachs should be subsidized by average hard-working taxpayers who benefit nothing from such subsidies? And as far as responsibility to shareholders, if huge bonuses are paid out, shouldn't that money go to the shareholders? We're talking billions of dollars here. I am sure that as a shareholder, you wouldn't mind a few hundred extra dollars in dividends. If it's all about shareholders, then why not give the windfall to the shareholders? <BR/><BR/>Ultimately, you don't have an issue with NYC taxpayers footing the bill to ensure that a shareholder in Grand Rapids earns another .05% percent on his investment, or the fact that shareholder money is being hoarded by CEOs who already earn 400 times what the average American working family brings in per year. You have some fucked up priorities. <BR/><BR/>re: Try not to be so resentful of others success; it is not an attractive trait.<BR/><BR/>I have an overdeveloped sense of social justice that doesn't permit me to remain silent when I see ruthless greed overcoming civic responsibility and common decency. Goldman-Sachs can earn their money the same way my father did, with hard effort, honesty, and without corporate welfare or tax breaks payed for the sweat and labor of others. <BR/><BR/>peaceShlomo Leib Aronovitzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10407211641091145197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31846591.post-40770885215191734552007-02-17T23:08:00.000-05:002007-02-17T23:08:00.000-05:00I am always at how anti-capitalists, such as yours...I am always at how anti-capitalists, such as yourself, can be so willfully ingnorant. Why should Goldman Sachs remain in the city, paying high NYC taxes? They not only have every right to leave the city for another state that offeres lower taxes, they are obligated to their shareholders to reduce cost as much as possible. Try not to be so resentful of others success; it is not an attractive trait.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com